Following the early March
announcement from Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chair of the U.S. Senate
Committee on the Judiciary, that he had reached a “tentative agreement in
principle” on a compromise patent reform bill with Sen. Jeff Sessions, the
committee’s ranking Republican member, NSBA has been sounding the alarm on
potential pitfalls of this compromise legislation.
NSBA chiefly objected to two
key elements of the original patent reform bill (S. 515): its provisions pertaining to
post-grant patent challenges and its conversion of the U.S. patent system from
a first-to-invent to a first-to-file system.
Although NSBA believes that
many of the most egregious aspects of the original bill’s post-grant patent
challenge provisions were addressed by the compromise language, it still is of
the opinion that its changes to post-grant patent challenges would put
small-business patentees at greater risk than the current system. The
complete lack of consideration of how the radical transformation to a
first-to-file invention priority system would affect small, innovative firms
and independent inventors remains unaddressed and highly problematic.
As
NSBA communicated to Senate leadership in early 2009, “It is imperative that
any effort to modernize and improve America’s patent system carefully consider
the effect on the nation’s small businesses.” This analysis has never been
performed, let alone considered.
NSBA,
therefore, is pleased that Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), chair of the U.S. Senate
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, introduced late last week a
bill that would address the alarming lack of consideration of how innovative
small firms and independent inventors would be affected by the conversion from
a first-to-invent to a first-to-file system.
The
Small Business Patent Data Collection Act
(S. 3089) directs the Office of Advocacy
at the U.S. Small Business Administration to conduct a study in consultation
with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office (PTO), analyzing if the conversion to a first-to-file system
would harm small firms’ ability to obtain patents and if so how and what the
overall potential costs and benefits of the transfiguration would be for small
businesses.
While highly appreciative of
Landrieu’s efforts, NSBA will continue to push for a final bill that delays the
implementation of the first-to-file conversion until a complete analysis of how
the transformation will affect small firms and what the benefits of such a
conversion would be has been completed.
NSBA continues to assert that
the proponents of this wholesale transformation bear the burden of proof on its
purported benefits, which must be clearly identified, quantified, and balanced
against any potential harm to the most innovative segment of the U.S. economy.
NSBA
urges the Congress to study and find the likely economic effects on
small U.S. innovative businesses before enacting sweeping changes to the patent
priority laws that have served America well for over 200 years.
